Describe the asset
Capture identity, purpose, domain, location, owners, consumers, and operational context.
Document datasets, tables, reports, APIs, models, and data products with ownership, classifications, lineage notes, quality status, access conditions, and review details.
Start with one important asset, assess completeness, then expand and export the local catalog.
Capture identity, purpose, domain, location, owners, consumers, and operational context.
Record sensitivity, personal-data status, access, lineage, quality, retention, and assurance.
Use completeness and duplicate checks, then export CSV or JSON locally.
Required fields are marked with an asterisk.
Add the current record, import local CSV, check duplicates, filter, and export. Records remain in this browser tab unless downloaded.
| Asset | Type | Domain | Owner | Sensitivity | Quality | Completeness | Duplicate | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No entries yet. | ||||||||
Treat the result as a structured metadata review, not proof that an asset is accurate, compliant, secure, or fit for every purpose.
Fixed weights total 100 points. A valid, non-empty field receives its full weight. No hidden adjustment is used.
The tool does not inspect systems, validate lineage, test data quality, assess legal obligations, or confirm access enforcement.
Prioritise low-scoring and high-risk assets, assign owners, standardise descriptions, confirm classifications, document access, and schedule reviews.
A lightweight structure for documenting important assets before adopting or expanding a formal catalog.
Datasets, tables, reports, APIs, analytical models, and data products.
Fixed weights are applied to twenty metadata fields and totalled as a percentage.
No. It measures metadata completeness.
No external service or API is used.
Yes. Download the CSV template and preserve its headers.
Matching normalized asset name, type, and domain combinations are flagged.
Use a safe schema, report path, API route, repository reference, or governed URL. Never include secrets.
An internal assurance or lifecycle label governed by your process.
According to criticality, sensitivity, change rate, and policy.
Yes. Exports can support metadata requirements, ownership remediation, migration, and onboarding.
Not necessarily, but inapplicable fields should follow a documented convention.